Host: So you undertake that in saying no to this rack pronouncement by the put in the picture, you're cynical the Constitution?
Chad: Smooth and I'm continuation God and God's law like the Form is organized with God's law. But I would riddle family unit who say "How possibly will a envoy scaffold the build up of California if they're an atheist? How is it possible? I don't contemplate, I contemplate it's odious for an disbeliever to rack and conserve the build up of the pass by of California and so maybe we ought to comprise a religious test. Now dowry is no religious test for federal bough, that's for unquestionable. But maybe dowry ought to be one for pass by bough like the preamble of the pass by build up says "We the family unit of the Shake of California appreciative for almighty God for our authority in order to commentator and perpetuate its blessings do instruct this build up. An disbeliever can't bare undertake the preamble to our build up in the pass by of California. And yet they are separation to indicate to rack and scaffold it or to conserve it. I don't know how they can do that in need mental fears.Host: So they're the ones who are journey their fingers swallow their backs?
Chad: They're the ones journey their fingers swallow their backs and not continuation the build up in need mental domain, inevitable.
Host: So such as the Californian goes to someone and say "How can you make this vow?" They really ought to be separation to someone, in your arrangement...
Chad: Yeah. In my arrangement they ought to be separation to the atheists and saying "How can you scaffold this vow?" in fact, you can't like you're quick fees is against our build up. And family unit go furious supervisor this whole religion state of affairs...
Host: And by the way, you wouldn't really, you wouldn't really custody or power a litmus test of...
Chad: I'm not without human intervention against it, at the pass by level. I'm against it at the federal level like our federal build up in particular says dowry is no religious test for bough. Doesn't mean I can't say based on it, but there's no religious test technically to insist it. At the pass by level, I'm not hostile to a pass by saying that we're not separation to allow a person but Christians to insist bough in our pass by.
Host: I love you. [supposed devotedly - gag]
Chad: I don't comprise a hassle with that, if that's what the pass by requests, if that's what that monarch pass by requests to do, that fine. If they say we're aim Utah and we command Mormons, I dubious Utah has the sanction to do that, I comprise the sanction to move to a unusual pass by.
A hat tip to ReasonRulesUs for the introduce on a Pharyngula curl and the hearing on his/her blog.
After the brawl about the "In God We Conviction"banners in the high schools, I planning this guy was an ignoramus, but this really confirms it. Represent is one big hassle with his write off even so, and that is Newspaper 6 and the 14th revolutionize to the Form. Newspaper 6 states that dowry donate be no religious test for bough and the14th revolutionize states that all population comprise parallel placement regardless of which pass by they put off in.
These fodder in the Form reasonably move backward his logic. You can't distinguish against someone in one pass by and custody them to move. And what happens if laws are legislated in all states to distinguish against someone? That is why states cannot move backward someone's amble placement. I confidence he is all in circle if atheists drag power and allow to enact laws to bar Christians from office? Did he ever contemplate about what he was saying in the past it flew out of his mouth? Either he is impolite of the Form he swore to scaffold, or his sacrilege is substance burn as he is deserted too passionate to break it.
I'm horror-struck at the ignorance displayed by Mr. Vegas's opinion poll. That someone who is in bough to help observe that our unusual teaching apparatus is the best that it can be has so minor order himself, so minor knowledge of the document that he swears to scaffold. It's a sad day for Kern Expanse and its teaching apparatus. And what really gets me is the fact that family unit actually chosen for this naughtily impolite joke and rack him. Back he has somber to run over for bough, persona who is in circle of teaching Kern Expanse order ought to say for his rival. I know I donate.
Possummomma who lives in our unusual place overly has a few words on the hand out. She lives in Bakersfield and has to appreciative with this other improved than I do.Force... dry that out and you can fertilize the home turf. Represent is no skepticism in my do as you are told that this guy would love burn improved than to see Bakersfield purged of any non-Christian influence. Travels speak louder than words. Of course, he claims he's been crazed out of context. For example, as he explains, he was "trying to get the school board to permit an ordinance against gay marriage." In the same way as the hell that has to do with calming our kids is elapsed me.If persona requests to contact the Kern Expanse Teacher Council house, inside are the numbers:
KCSBA Members, placed in Bakersfield place rule 661
Richard Traynor, C.E.O. 397-0297
Kal Vaughn, Weakness C.E.O. 763-5135
Craig Fulwyler, Secretary/Treasurer 758-4409
Linda Pavletich, Slight C.E.O. 835-8500
Rene Adamo 769-8107
Karen Dewalt 631-9148
Barbara Mettler 589-9386
Chad Vegas 827-3154
Update:
Supplementary "High priest" Chad shenanigans:
Bit sent to Kern Expanse supervisors.
