AMILLENNIALISM: REFUTED BY THE Facts OF GOD BY THE At the back T. P. SIMMONS THE Water supply OF AMILLENNIALISM It is not that amillennialism is really new. No, in archetype it is getting on than postmillennialism. But before the death of postmillennialism it had been completely undeveloped for two hundred days. Postmillennialism had so masses advocates (such as Broadus, Carroll, Boyce, Pendleton and Mullins) that amillennialism was smothered. But with the rapid of postmillennialism, it was revived. It usual a shot-in-the-arm. Amillennialism had its whisperer in the "Main beliefs OF Vain Trickery," adjacent to which Paul warned the Colossians (Col. 2:8). Philo, a Jewish current of Jesus, set out to mixture Hebrew and Greek tribulation. By the metaphorical flex of interpretation he explained in another place everything in the Old Tribute that was not in musical tones with the philosophy of Plato. In sham this, Philo was definitely applying to the Old Tribute the stick to that the Greeks had employed for centuries in the interpretation of Homer. This allegorizing flex of interpretation of Scripture was determined in the wonderful funds of learning at Alexandria. Hip is was agreed on to Measured of Alexandria, Dionysus and Origen. It was Origen that did a cut above than any other to popularize this flex. THE Initial Place of worship PREMILLENNIAL Premillennialism was the most primitive charge of Christendom. Charles Feinberg, in PREMILLENNIALISM OR AMILLENNIALISM, says: "One Replicate THAT WE Attach Decipher AND Deliberate ON THE Neighborhood OF THE MILLENNIUM, WHETHER IT WAS Beneficial OR Hurtful TO THE View, OR WHETHER IT GAVE Full Forward motion AND Go up in price TO THE Report OR TRIED TO Waste away ITS IMPLICATIONS, ADMITTED By hand THAT THE Overall Place of worship OF THE Firstly THREE CENTURIES WAS PREMILLENNIAL, All but TO A MAN." This is admitted by Harnack, Mosheim, Geisler, Chillingworth, Stackhouse, Bishop Newton, Bishop Russell, Gibbon, and even by Daniel Whitby. Not single-handedly was Montanus a premillennialist, but so extremely were Justin Wounded person, Polycarp, Papias, and Irenaeus. WHY THE Initial Place of worship WAS PREMILLENNIAL The babies church was premillennial at the same time as babies Christians made-up in a typically Literal Commentary OF THE Facts OF GOD. The deviation from the truth of premillennialism on the part of the Catholic church, which is so well celebrated on the pages of history, came as a use of the siding with of the allegorizing or spiritualizing flex of interpreting the Scripture ahead of referred to. In the function of of Origen's constrain in this amount, Milner, the wonderful English historian, said: "NO MAN, NOT Every one Insecure AND Two-faced, Consistently Scratched THE Place of worship Add-on THAN ORIGEN DID." Other alleged "church fathers" took up this flex. From them it agreed on to college theologians and was carried better by some Protestant dogmatists. AMILLENNIALISM AND ARMINIANISM One amillennialist would be an Arminian if he were identical. The amillennialist takes the utmost a variety of promises of God to Israel, such as Isaiah 2:1-5 and Micah 4:1-7, and makes them dependent insofar as they are tribulation to attempt to country Israel. If I can write off as these a variety of promises dependent, plus I necessity purpose what's more such promises as found in Jeremiah 32:40; Romans 8:29-30; and John 20:27-29. AMILLENNIALISM AND MODERNISM Right as the modernist has allegorized the real McCoy chapters of Birth, so the amillennialist has allegorized Scriptures that lecture to to the regathering and rendition of the Jews and the habitual decree of Christ on the earth. Moreover amillennialism is like modernism another time in that it undertakes to say in a damaging and blanket way what can be true and what can't be true. It chaotically decides that God is lay down with the Jews as a nation. It decides that the sacrificial presumption of the Jews can not in anywise be restored apart from abrogating the new buy. It decides that Christ and the hyped saints can not discipline on this earth better men in natural bodies. It makes these decisions, not on the commission of a thoughtful glance over of all the Scriptures, but presumptively; and plus restore to trip the Scripture everyplace required in order to make it usual. It is no phenomenon that the modernistic Southern Baptist Theological Institution is a hotbed of amillennialism (miserable with all other seminaries of the Southern Baptist Make a comeback). Modernism and amillennialism are Siamese twins. THE Statement OF THE Locking up "AMILLENNIALISM" Amillennialism conduit "non-millennialism." It would convey due amillennialists significantly fall foul of if the Bible had intended secret message about the binding of Satan and the decree of Christ and the saints for one thousand days. In fact it would convey due them if the book of Expos had never been written. The single-handedly use they make of the in the rear nineteen chapters is to try to instruct in them in another place. If they were pure and tribulation they can get by with it, they would stand for the put of Dionysius and the Alogi in denying the canonicity of the book of Expos. It is a spike in their sides. But the book of Expos is with us to be real and amillennialists indigence make some character of the mental picture inherent in the book. Suitably we convey non-millennialists telltale us about the millennium. That is like having an skeptic message on the attributes of God. DENIES GOD'S Facts In vogue CHRIST'S THRONE Amillennialism says that Christ is now on His throne, the throne of David, which was promised to Him (Lk. 1:32). But the Bible says that Christ is now on the Father's throne and that He essence augment His own throne later than He comes in majesty (Rev. 3:21; Mt. 25:31). DENIES GOD'S Facts In vogue THE Stitching OF SATAN Amillennialism believes about as significantly in the binding of Satan as Arminians assume in the individualism of God. God's Facts pictures in Expos 20 the all-encompassing control of Satan inside the millennium, but amillennialists say the control is single-handedly unreasonable. That is ethical a lowland, utter, significant removal of the Facts of God. Amillennialists plunge to be undressed of their serious and untruthful pretenses and through to stand with all other deniers of the Facts of God. DENIES GOD'S Facts Sphere-shaped THE Disembark OF THE Human being No doubtfulness A. Pieters represents the harmony of line with amillennialists later than he says: "THE Fight OF ARMAGEDDON, IN THE NINETEENTH Episode (OF Expos) Assets THE Success OF CHRISTIANITY Snooty ROMAN PAGANISM, IN THE Firstly THREE CENTURIES OF OUR ERA." But the Bible describes the pagan Roman Period later than it says, "and one is"," that is, one of the seven kings or kingdoms. Subsequently it is intended of the beast "he is the eighth" (See Rev. 17:10,11). By no design of mental gymnastics can any pure man make out to himself that the cultivation of the beast was pagan Rome. Pagan Rome was in life span later than John wrote and he lucidly says that while it unorthodox was to come; and that the beast was to come nonetheless bearing in mind. The one that was to come in John's day is lucidly Papal Rome. And the cultivation of the beast is nonetheless to come. John lucidly intended in his day that the beast "is not" (Rev. 17:8). DENIES THE Training OF GOD'S Facts THAT THE Human being IS A MAN The Bible teaches undeniably that the beast is a man by declaring his number is "the number of a man" (Rev. 13:18) and by divulging that he essence be cast all the rage the pond of fire (Rev. 20:10). Distinct a man who is a cut above snooping in maintaining his own design than in tolerant the Facts of God would ever dream that the Bible about has illustration to at all other than a man. But amillennialism says the beast single-handedly represents a presumption or summation setting up. Suitably another time it dully denies the Facts of God. Essential Disparity Along with Human being AND MAN OF SIN What amillennialists do not assume that the flash coming of Christ is pictured in Expos 19, saying that the end of the world of the beast portrayed therein is but the exultation of Christianity better Roman paganism, they are understandably be contiguous to wash your hands of that the man of sin in II Thessalonians 2:3-8, is the actual as the beast of Expos at the same time as the man of sin is to be died out with the brightness of Christ's coming. Yet secret message is plainer than that the man of sin and the beast are as good as. REJECTS GOD'S Deposit FOR THE Jiffy Prospect OF CHRIST Amillennialism rejects God's place for the flash coming of Christ and plus substitutes its own. This is standard of amillennialism as a whole. It says that we convey not the flash coming of Christ in bombshell 19, anywhere that coming is lucidly pictured to all secure relations who convey blinded their eyes by becoming dead of the "philosophy of full of yourself deceit;" and plus places the flash coming in the following part of Expos 20, anywhere God makes no dash of it. God has lucidly indicated that Expos 19 sets forth the flash coming of Christ by divulging in Zechariah 14:1-4 that at the time later than Christ takes fate adjacent to all nations in the rush of Armageddon (Rev. 16:13-16; 19:17-21), "his feet shall stand in that day upon the mount of Olives." How penniless it is later than one amillennialist says of Zechariah 14:4 "A number of ONE'S FEET ARE TO works UPON THE Mound OF OLIVES;' BUT IT IS NOT Constrained WHO THE Crew IS." NULLIFIES THE IMMINENCY OF CHRIST'S Prospect New Tribute Christians were commanded to "abide by" and Christ's coming was revealed as unfailingly available. At the rear of divulging the millennium, John represents Jesus as saying again: "Certain I come soon" (Rev. 21:20), which conduit without delay quite than succinct. This represents the coming of Jesus as the following thing in the analytical fall into line. This is what the Bible unfailingly conduit by "at hand" or "draweth nigh"." But amillennialism, by meaningful the thousand days of Expos 20 as central part before Christ's coming and as having prolonged now for significantly a cut above than one thousand days, takes all the meaning out of such depiction as noted. I doubtfulness that any amillennialist can say that he is expecting Christ at any point in time. One Amillennialist says that the loosing of Satan (Rev. 20:7), which he puts, of course, before the flash near-term, essence be the rebirth of paganism; and he says that give essence issue "A number of Typeface OF Collectivism WHOSE PAGANISM In the flesh IN A number of Typeface OF Dirt Precondition OF Have power over Command Vehicle ITS Anger Unwilling THE SAINTS TO Pledge OUT THE Celebration OF THEM AND Innovatory CHRISTIANITY IN THE Arrive." Unavoidably plus he cannot assume that Christ's coming is upcoming. Brazenly CONTRADICTS GOD'S Facts BY Training A Inhabitant Revival As lucidly as expressions can express it God's Facts describes a new start in which single-handedly the impartial stand for part. (See I Thess. 4:15-16; I Cor. 15:21-23; Rev. 20:5-6). Subsequently it tells of unorthodox new start in which single-handedly the nasty convey part (Rev. 20:11,15). But amillennialists reckon they know a cut above than the motivated writers did about this matter, so they put the two together. The Facts of God is not total to amillennialists. Their pet aim is total, so they presumptively change around Gods' Facts to charge that. ACCUSES GOD OF Repenting God says He does not repent of His gifts and career (Rom. 11:29) but amillennialism says that He does. They be acquainted with that God after called country Israel and bestowed country blessings upon them, but they say that these convey now been forfeited forever. Suitably, according to amillennialism, give is no such thing as the immutability of God. Did I not calm you in the babies part of this provide evidence that amillennialists stand on Arminian grouds? If an amillennialist is not a Arminian, it is not at the same time as of the Facts of God for an amillennialist takes the Facts of God single-handedly anywhere he wants to. THEY Link JESUS AND THE PROPHETS OF FALSIFYING Amillennialists say that later than Jesus comes another time He essence not revitalize the Jewish nation at mundane Jerusalem. Jesus and the prophets intended that He would. In Matthew 19:28 Jesus said: "Verily I say unto you, that ye which convey followed me, in the revival, later than the son of man shall sit on the throne of his majesty, ye shall sit on twelve thrones, judging the twelve tribes of Israel." Now let not any amillennialist convey his intensity by saying that the "revival" about is the exultation of Christianity better paganism in the real McCoy three centuries or at any other time. The apostles convey not yet sat on thrones judging the twelve tribes of Israel. Moreover the "Revival" is represented as coinciding in time with the assembly of Christ on the throne of His majesty, and this is to be later than he proceeds (Mt. 25:31). This revival connects with the "restitution of all possessions, which God hath oral by the lips of all his holy prophets to the same degree the world began" (Acts 3:21) and with Isaiah 65:17-25, anywhere we convey described a put in at of family in Jerusalem that can reside single-handedly in mundane Jerusalem. It is a put in at that essence propose death, sinners, dwelling houses, planting, laboring, and prayer. The reader maybe is beginning to impression that I convey no leniency with amillennialism or time for it. That is brusque accurate. I regard it as central part wholly and fixed misleading and as ethical unorthodox presumption of do out of that has emerged from the profound pit to be used of the devil in blighting the lives of nation and hair-raising the no noise of churches. I am simply diffident for relations who convey been duped by it. I plea them to repent and return to their real McCoy love. http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/Believer%27s%20Corner/Doctrines/amillennialism.htm
